Changing the culture to obliterate silos is not easy. It involves a culture change: Low-code/no-code requires a change in an organization’s culture, whether that organization be an enterprises or a startup. Here are some of the more critical challenges for low-code/no-code:ġ. In many ways, low-code/no-code is at its infancy – even though MDD has been around for a long time: especially with BPM platforms. With traditional programming, there is an enormous body of experience, robust communities, and documented best practices. Many best practices are just emerging and are relatively immature. Low-code/no-code platforms have many benefits, but they also present some challenges and involve a learning curve.
Work management: A good example in this category is.E-commerce and online stores: A leading example in this category is Shopify.Other categories of low-code/no-code platforms target specific application areas or niches: Many of these platforms provide rich collections of plug-ins and templates for certain types of applications.
Thunkable is perhaps the ultimate example for low-code/no-code mobile application development. Others offer native support for the leading mobile operations systems (iOS and Android). Mobile application development: Most low-code/no-code platforms, such as Bubble, provide responsive UI capabilities for mobile applications. The automated workflow can be run on-demand, scheduled, or invoked via a webhook. Here is an example of a Parabola workflow that pulls from an API, does some data manipulations, and then sends it to another API. You can develop powerful and complex integration flows relatively quickly through these tools. There are also NoSQL database low-code/no-code platforms such as KgBase for knowledge graphs.Īutomated integration low-code/no-code platforms: There are several exciting and emerging platforms in this domain: Zapier, Parabola, and Integromat are in this category. The leading contenders are WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, and WebFlow.ĭatabase management low-code/no-code platforms: On the high end (enterprise), you have platforms such as Mendix. Web site low-code/no-code platforms: Enterprises of all sizes can leverage these platforms. (Disclosure: I previously worked as VP of BPM technology at Pega.)īut there are other paradigms under the low-code/no-code umbrella: Examples of BPM low-code/no-code platforms include Appian, Pega, and Outsystems. (The most popular process mapping standard supported by most BPM platforms is BPMN.) So process-centric low-code solutions are quite popular. This diagramming is similar to the BPM process-map approach, where, to specify a business process, you drag and drop shapes representing subprocesses into the correct order.
#Low magic maps software#
BPM has long supported model-driven development (MDD) - where you first diagram how software should work before building it. Not surprisingly, many low-code platforms are business process management platforms. Similarly, small and midsized businesses usually do not tend to purchase the enterprise platforms – primarily due to their pricing and complexity. Some of the small-business platform vendors will not be known or recognized in enterprises. There is not much of an intersection between the small-business and the enterprise low-code platforms. G2 offers a similar landscape overview for small-sized businesses. Gartner defines a low-code application platform (LCAP) as “an application platform that supports rapid application development, one-step deployment, execution and management using declarative, high-level programming abstractions, such as model-driven and metadata-based programming languages.” Here’s Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for enterprise low-code platforms: Enterprise low-code/no-code platforms provide high scalability, performance, security, and integration with enterprise applications. For example, there are submarkets targeting large enterprises, medium-sized businesses, and small businesses. The low-code/no-code landscape is complex, with numerous solutions, platforms, and submarkets. A survey by No-Code Census in 2020 showed a 4.6X productivity gain over traditional programming. The results were impressive: 5X to 7X productivity improvement with low-code/no-code development. I was involved in an early comparative productivity benchmark test between traditional development (using Java) and a model-driven low-code/no-code development project back in 2017.
0 kommentar(er)
